Showing posts sorted by relevance for query tergiversate. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query tergiversate. Sort by date Show all posts
Thursday, November 13, 2008
I'm sorry?
Did I hear that right? I will have to dig up a link later, but this is about the denial that Bush is still in, and the qualification Wells Fargo (CEO or someone) made, about the bail out not going for executive salaries. It is unfair for me to begin this blast without further digging, but just the surface sod is soaked with effluence. So I will sort some key words from the Bush: "capitalism" in conjunction/contrast to "free market".
With Wells Fargo it is a matter of bookkeeping and an earlier flip-flop it seems, on the matter of what the bailout is going for... are we rescuing failing institutions or helping those that are efficient? In this case I have rather unparsed and taken a tangent from the trickle-down of the bonus problem, but there is a righteous problem about the housing bubble and fundamentals.
Maybe a graphic form will help:
Capitalism - - Free Market
Bonuses - - Book Keeping
Rescue - - Help
Bubble - - Fundamentals
Meaning, Myth, Model, Metaphor; may be my mantra,
but there is a cycle that needs work.
And to my estimation (tergiversate[**] or not) the housing bubble is a result of a fundamental flaw in economics. It works for those that buy it. But it really matters what the it is. Not to mention who sells it.
Not to mention the media again: WWWWWH? I might return to give more particular sources, but for now I leave with the answer: who, what, when, where, why, and how? as well as note the only labels at this time are Progressive Media and Thom Hartmann, and if I return I will [bracket][*$*]changes.[*]
[* as soon as I finished this and bracketed that, I thought, and must note that I have now made minor edits (& bold) for clarity sake, unbracketed.]
[** I wonder if I am a De-tergiversator ***?]
[*** I had to go old school and open a book, the answer is; not if it is (the latter) to change one's opinion, but may be others, not the De. Yeah, the De and the Un.]
[*$*] passing the buck I have not returned but simply connected here
With Wells Fargo it is a matter of bookkeeping and an earlier flip-flop it seems, on the matter of what the bailout is going for... are we rescuing failing institutions or helping those that are efficient? In this case I have rather unparsed and taken a tangent from the trickle-down of the bonus problem, but there is a righteous problem about the housing bubble and fundamentals.
Maybe a graphic form will help:
Capitalism - - Free Market
Bonuses - - Book Keeping
Rescue - - Help
Bubble - - Fundamentals
Meaning, Myth, Model, Metaphor; may be my mantra,
but there is a cycle that needs work.
And to my estimation (tergiversate[**] or not) the housing bubble is a result of a fundamental flaw in economics. It works for those that buy it. But it really matters what the it is. Not to mention who sells it.
Not to mention the media again: WWWWWH? I might return to give more particular sources, but for now I leave with the answer: who, what, when, where, why, and how? as well as note the only labels at this time are Progressive Media and Thom Hartmann, and if I return I will [bracket][*$*]changes.[*]
[* as soon as I finished this and bracketed that, I thought, and must note that I have now made minor edits (& bold) for clarity sake, unbracketed.]
[** I wonder if I am a De-tergiversator ***?]
[*** I had to go old school and open a book, the answer is; not if it is (the latter) to change one's opinion, but may be others, not the De. Yeah, the De and the Un.]
[*$*] passing the buck I have not returned but simply connected here
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Pink Floyd
Post e. g.
Shades of Plato.
Knot too Cave.
Lost^ in Translation.
^ trans-something/not mogrify labelism
[The E Ron Crisis.]
From the bottomlineup!
tergiversate/Di-spencer with/the wall/social Darwinism.
BFT:(back from tangent^)
In the "corporations are people" and "government is bad" absolutist field, Kant we see that death to a country(read that the ideal of the name) is not death to a people(except if change is the enemy)^^. The act of saying/wiping any name off the map, does not mean people die, unless people die. Changing or wiping off a name is not an existential threat. Anymore than American describes a people, or Zion is a race or state. This can be seen in the poll(I speculate), that Iranians might hate America, but be more favorable to the people and other principles. It might also be seen in the take on Israel from True Torah Jews. But change is a threat to a part of us all. Even the name Zion has geographical and metaphysical branches.(Castle/Dry Land/Brook)
^^ context is everything and Mani-Hegelism; like might means maybe, and duality does not mean to exclude.
(too the moon!)
[Supply and Demand Myth] Supply more money and demand will increase. Oops that was too Economic. Demand must come from the bottom up, that is how the money gets created. Ironically or Mani-Hegelianistically answers don't come from above. The slippery-slope or domino theory are about the set up and playing the game, not the slippery game and knocking it all down.
Shades of Plato.
Knot too Cave.
Lost
[The E Ron Crisis.]
From the bottomlineup!
tergiversate/Di-spencer with/the wall/social Darwinism.
BFT:(back from tangent
In the "corporations are people" and "government is bad" absolutist field, Kant we see that death to a country(read that the ideal of the name) is not death to a people(except if change is the enemy)
(too the moon!)
[Supply and Demand Myth] Supply more money and demand will increase. Oops that was too Economic. Demand must come from the bottom up, that is how the money gets created. Ironically or Mani-Hegelianistically answers don't come from above. The slippery-slope or domino theory are about the set up and playing the game, not the slippery game and knocking it all down.
Tuesday, November 04, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)